The biggest cause of failure of a GBS model in a company is negative “perceptions.” These include the perception that GBS is too expensive, that it is not delivering the right quality operations for the cost, or that a lower cost of operations has led to a diminished employee experience. Often these perceptions are shaped by big, one-off circumstantial incidents (e.g., a visible email outage). Or, when cost-savings are delivered, there is no reference data on whether the service cost is competitive versus external benchmarks. Other times it may be the perception that the trend is not moving in the right direction.
Such perceptions often ignore the underlying cause that GBS services may be operating against targets that are inherently unviable (e.g., delivering improved service levels at reduced FTEs and with no control over the money or people for continuous improvement). Also, these perceptions may be driven by a lack of visibility or sufficient choices for senior business leaders over the GBS costing model.
Creating an overall “GBS financial model” which includes GBS cost management, transparent chargeback and recovery mechanisms, GBS choices to the business units, and an effective story on how GBS’ financial performance relates to peer benchmarks, is therefore critical.
This pillar delivers a holistic GBS Financial Model, as well as the implementation tools and techniques for implementing it for a given GBS service (like Payroll shared service).